Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47339 (MAD)

Krishnasamy @ Kumar v. The State of Tamilnadu

CRL OP(MD)/13114/2026 · 2026-07-02

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD) No.13114 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P(MD) No.13114 of 2026 Krishnasamy @ Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, DCB, Karur District. (Cr.No.6 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in event of his arrest, pending investigation in Crime No.6 of 2026 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.A.M.Senthil Kumar For Respondent : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 406 and 420 of IPC in Crime No.6 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD) No.13114 of 2026 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he claiming himself as Driver in the Collector Office and promised to secure a Computer Operator job to the defacto complainant's son and collected a sum of Rs.5,50,000/- in various dates and subsequently cheated them. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that admittedly in the FIR, alleged payments were made during the year 2019 and FIR only registered after lapse of six years. Due to the financial dispute, the complaint has been registered. He further submitted that the petitioner has not involved in any of the offences as alleged by the defacto complainant and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police, reported that the FIR was registered only recently and the investigation is pending. The petitioner, by making false promise, collected money from the defacto complainant and cheated. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous case. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD) No.13114 of 2026 to the petitioner. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) for the respondent. 6. Considering the fact that the alleged money transaction happened during the year 2019 and the FIR has been registered and he demanded back money after lapse of six years and and there is no previous case as against the petitioner and also considering the nature of purpose, the money has paid, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD) No.13114 of 2026 and when required for the interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 02.07.2026 Indu 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD) No.13114 of 2026 To 1.The learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Karur. 2.The Inspector of Police, DCB, Karur District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD) No.13114 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR.J Indu Crl.O.P(MD) No.13114 of 2026 02.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis