Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1881-DB R.F.A. No.950/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.950/2020 (PAR/DEC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. ANIL KUMAR S/O LATE APPAJAPPA AGED 29 YEARS.
2.
SRI. A. NAVEEN KUMAR S/O LATE APPAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS.
3.
SMT. A. PALLAVI D/O LATE APPAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS.
4.
SMT. BHAGYAMMA W/O LATE APPAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.
APPELLANT NO.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT. MALLENAHALLI VILLAGE JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562102.
&APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PRADEEP H.S. ADV.,)
Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: High Court Of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1881-DB R.F.A. No.950/2020
AND:
1.
SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE APPAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT. MALLENAHALLI VILLAGE JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562102.
2.
SRI. E. RAVISHANKARACHARI S/O EASHWARACHARI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS AGRICULTURIST AND GOLD SMITH R/AT JAIN TEMPLE ROAD BANGARUPET KOLAR DISTRICT-563114.
&RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJ PRABHU S, ADV., FOR R1)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.85/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SIDLAGHATTA. SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD:14.02.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.85/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SIDLAGHATTA. PASS A JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS BY DISMISSING THE SUIT IN O.S.NO.85/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SIDLAGHATTA, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE APPEAL & ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1881-DB R.F.A. No.950/2020
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The memo for withdrawal reads as under:
"That due to the intervention of the common friends and relatives the dispute between the Appellants and Respondents are settled out of the Court. Hence there is nothing survival for
consideration. Therefore the Appellants filed this memo before this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the appeal.
Wherefore, the Appellants pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the Appeal as withdrawn."
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
ABK List No.: 4 Sl No.: 1