1 2026:CGHC:14589 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 866 of 2025 1 - Dr. Prabhulal Chandan S/o Late Piluram Chandan Aged About 60 Years Posted As Medical Officer Simga District Balodabazaar - Bhatapara (C.G.). --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Police Station - Rakhi, New Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Director, Directorate Of Health Service, Iii Floor Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Chief Health And Medical Officer, Balodabazaar- Bhatapara (C.G.). 4 - Dr. Parasnath Patel Block Medical Officer, Primary Health Center Simga District Balodabazaar - Bhatapara (C.G.). --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Bajpai, Advocate For Respondents/State No.1 to 3 : Ms. Apurva Nigam, P.L. For Respondent No.4 : Mr. S.S. Barik, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Gaurav Singhal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 27/03/2026. 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- 10.1 To kindly call for the records of the case from the Respondents. 10.2 To kindly set-aside and quash the order dated 02.11.2020 and 12.11.2020 (Annexure P-1) passed by the respondent No.3. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 10.3 To kindly direct the respondent authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner submitted before the respondent authorities.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to respondent No.2 and 3 to consider and take decision on the representation dated 23.09.2024 and 10.10.2024 raising a grievance that petitioner has not been given proper seniority and appropriate place in gradation list. He submits that he may be permitted to submit fresh representation before respondents No.2 and 3 and direction be issued to concerned respondents to consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner at the earliest. 3. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, she is having no objection. 4. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh comprehensive representation raising all grounds available, along with all supporting documents, before respondent No.2 and 3 and if such representation is submitted, the concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of three months from the date of receipt of representation. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram