08.10.2026 Sl. No.: 14 Court No.654 BM C.O.1931 of 2026 SONIA MAJUMDER VS ACYUMEN VINIMAY PVT. LTD. AND ORS Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee ... for the petitioner 1. The petitioner obtained an order dated 27th February, 2026 from the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission under Consumer Complaint No.SC/19/CC/651/2018. By the said order the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission directed the opposite party no.64 and 67 to refund the sum of Rs.21,90,700/- along with simple interest @7% per annum on such amount. 2. After obtaining said order the petitioner duly applied for certified copy of the order. The certified copy which was supplied to the petitioner contained names of the respondents but did not have the number of each respondent. Although, by the order dated 27th February, 2026 the respondent no.64 and 67 were directed to compensate the petitioner. 3. The petitioner made an application for correcting the said certified copy of the order and an order passed in such application for correction of the name. In spite thereof the fresh certified copy issued to the petitioner contained the same mistake as the previous one. 2 4. In such circumstances, the office of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission is directed to serve the petitioner a correct certified copy containing respondent number of each opposite party within 15 days so that the petitioner can identify number of opposite party no.64 and 67 for the purpose of claiming the refund of Rs.21,90,700/- together with interest from the said opposite party. 5. With the above observation, C.O. 1931 of 2026 is disposed of. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. ( Aryak Dutt, J. )