- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5788 MFA No. 7753 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7753 OF 2018 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. NATARAJ D KAMATH S/O DEVAPPA KAMATH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SMT USHA NATARAJ KAMATH W/O NATARAJ D KAMATH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING OF R/O HOUSE NO.1/501-502 NEW TELCO ROAD, UDYAM NAGAR, PUNE CITY, MAHARASTRA STATE REPRESENTED BY THEIR G P A HOLDER SMT. VASANTHI, W/O. K.S.LAKSHMISHA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RO. SRI GURU ANNAKRUPA, BETMAKKI NEW COLONY, BEHIND GOVERNMENT HIGH PRIMARY SCHOOL, THIRTHAHALLI-577432. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHETHAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B S PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. POORVIK D K S/O K S DEVADAS Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5788 MFA No. 7753 of 2018 AGED 20 YEARS C/O M G MANI HEGDE M N S COMPLEX NEAR RAILWAY STATION YESHAVANTHAPURA BENGALURU-560 020 PERMANENT R/O MARIGUNI SALURU POST, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 2. K S DEVADAS S/O K N SHANKARAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS PRESENT R/O PERMANENT R/O MARIGUNI, SALURU POST THIRTHAHALLI TALUK-577 432 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 3. SMT. PRATHIMA W/O K S DEVADAS AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS PRESENT R/O PERMANENT R/O MARIGUNI, SALURU POST THIRTHAHALLI TALUK-577 432 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 4. DELETED …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND PATTAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.SREEDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 AND R3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; VIDE ORDER DATED 03.04.2019, R4 IS DELETED) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5788 MFA No. 7753 of 2018 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.Chethan, counsel on behalf of Sri.B.S.Prasad, for the appellants appeared in person and submits that the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 2. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the submission as the appeal having become infructuous. 3. The oral submission is placed on record. 4. Appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33