Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4729 (RAJ)

FIROZ S/O KADAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4914/2026 · 2026-04-02

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13956] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4914/2026 1. Firoz S/o Kadar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Jogi Danda Chatikana Thana Kotwali Karauli District Karauli Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Karauli). 2. Rohit @ Ishak S/o Gulam, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Jogi Danda Chatikana Thana Kotwali Karauli District Karauli Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/04/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.64/2026 registered at Police Station Karauli, District Karauli for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that although there is an allegation of causing grievous injuries to Pulkit but none of the said injuries have been opined to be life-threatening. The petitioners have been in judicial custody since 26.02.2026. It is further submitted that though petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:13956] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4914/2026] Firoz has a criminal antecedent of two cases but he is already bailed out in those cases whereas no criminal case is reported against petitioner Rohit. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Firoz S/o Kadar & Rohit @ Ishak S/o Gulam, shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before the Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/113