DR MUKESH PRASAD v. COAL INDIA LTD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR
WPC/4028/2019 · 2026-01-06
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4729 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4729 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:828 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P(S) No. 4028 of 2019 Dr. Mukesh Prasad, son of Late Devendra Prasad, aged about 59 years, resident of New Doctor's Colony, Quarter No. V/9, Jagjiwan Nagar, P.Ο. Jagjiwan Nagar, P.S. Seraidhela, District Dhanbad.
....Petitioner.
-Versus-
1. Coal India Ltd., a Government of India Undertaking under Ministry of Coal, having its registered office at Coal Bhawan, Premises No. 04 MAR, Plot AF-III, Action Area-III, New Town, Rajarhat, P.O. & P.S. Rajarhat, District Kolkata, West Bengal, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director.
2. Director (Personnel), Coal India Ltd., Coal Bhawan, Premises No. 04 MAR, Plot AF-III, Action Area-III, New Town, Rajarhat, P.O. & P.S. Rajarhat, District Kolkata, West Bengal.
3. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., a subsidiary of Coal India Ltd., having its registered office at Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. BCCL Township, P.S. Seraidhela, District Dhanbad, through its Chairman-cum- Managing Director.
4. Director (Personnel), Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. BCCL Township, P.S. Seraidhela, District Dhanbad.
5. General Manager (Personnel), Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. BCCL Township, P.S. Seraidhela, District Dhanbad.
6. Chief of Medical Services, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. BCCL Township, P.S. Seraidhela, District Dhanbad .....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Rohitashya Roy, Tarun Kr.
Mahato, Advocates, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Shubham Malviya, A.C to Mr.
Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate
--
07/06.01.2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
This writ application has been preferred by the Petitioner for the following reliefs: (a) In the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to show cause as to why and under what authority they have discriminated against the petitioner by not considering his promotion from E-6 to E-7 Grade with effect from 2012; (b) For a further direction upon the respondents to immediately and forthwith grant promotion to the petitioner from E-6 to E-7 Grade with effect from
2026:JHHC:828 2
2012 with all such consequential benefits as he may be entitled to by suitably modifying the order of his promotion contained in office order no. B-291 dated 26.05.2017 (Annexure-6) and /or by implementing the said order of promotion with effect from 2012 in respect of the petitioner only;
3.
From the pleadings, it appears that the representation filed by the Petitioner for considering his name for promotion from E-6 to E-7 Grade is still pending before the Respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the parties fairly submits that the instant application may be disposed of in view of Paras-31 & 32 of the writ application to the effect that the representation is pending by giving direction to the concerned respondent to take a decision in the matter.
5.
Having regard to the aforesaid submission and after going through Paras- 31 & 32, the instant writ application stands disposed of by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent no.1- Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Coal India Ltd. within a period of 6 weeks.
The moment, the concerned Respondent will receive the fresh representation, he shall pass an order after verification of the records as per applicable Rules and Regulations of the Respondent-Coal Company. The order shall be passed within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.
6.
Accordingly, the instant writ application stands
disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
6th January, 2026
Jk
Uploaded on
20/01/2026