IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.190 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-454 Year-2025 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Yadav S/O Lalit Yadav @ Vinod Yadav Resident of village- Mahinathpur, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani 2. Aman Kumar @ Aman Yadav S/O Lalit Yadav @ Vinod Yadav Resident of village- Mahinathpur, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani 3. Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Yadav S/O Raman Ji Yadav Resident of village- Mahinathpur, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 20-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(3), 126(1), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 324(2), 303(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per F.I.R., informant alleges that all the named accused persons, including these petitioners, committed maar- peet, looted cash from the house of informant on gunpoint and made indiscriminate firing in air. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.190 of 2026(2) dt.20-01-2026 2/2 both parties are co-villagers and due to petty dispute, scuffle took place between them. Case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. It is further submitted that though there is allegation of firing but no one sustained any firearms injury. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Madhubani in connection with Rajnagar P. S. Case No. 454 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T