Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47287 (KAR)

M M KANJAN v. V SULOCHANA

MFA/8323/2018 · 2026-02-02

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5789 MFA No. 8323 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8323 OF 2018 (CPC) BETWEEN: M M KANJAN S/O LATE MAHABALESHWAR AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.237, SHARADA COLONY, 3RD STAGE, 4TH BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR BENGALURU-560079. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. JAYASIMHA K P & KPJ ASSTS., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. V SULOCHANA W/O LATE G R SAMPTH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 2. VISHNU S/O LATE G R SAMAPTH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 3. VINAY S/O LATE G R SAMPATH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.236 SHARADA COLONY, 3RD STAGE, 4TH BLOCK Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5789 MFA No. 8323 of 2018 BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU-560079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T P SRINIVASA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. A perusal of the daily order sheet reflects that the appeal was listed on 04.03.2020. On that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36