25_WP2327_26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2327 OF 2026 Union Bank of India … Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents Ms. Priyam Amin a/w. Mr. N. Amin (through VC) i/b. N. N. Amin & Co. for Petitioner. Adv. Willson Gaikwad, Court Commissioner. Mr. Vivek Phadke (through VC) for Respondent Nos.6 and 7. CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2026 P.C. : . The learned Court Commissioner has submitted a written report stating that the directions contained in the order dated 12.08.2026 have been complied with. The report is taken on record. 2. This is further confirmed by Ms. Amin, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner bank (secured creditor). Hence, nothing more survives in this petition. 3. At this stage, Mr. Phadke, learned counsel for respondent Nos.6 and 7 submits that they have filed a securitisation application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT). He submits that this Court may observe that the securitisation application may be decided on its own merits by the DRT. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 1/2 MINAL SANDIP PARAB Digitally signed by MINAL SANDIP PARAB Date: 2026.08.28 17:31:34 +0530 25_WP2327_26.doc 5. Needless to say, the securitisation application filed by respondent Nos.6 and 7 before the DRT shall be decided on its own merits expeditiously. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner bank submits on instructions that the charges of the learned Court Commissioner shall be paid within a week from today. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) 2/2 Minal Parab