Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47274 (PAT)

Naushad Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./2976/2026 · 2026-01-30

Ramesh Chand Malviya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2976 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-373 Year-2015 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Naushad Ahmad, aged about 45 years, Male Son of Late Faizal Imam Resident of Village -Ganpat Tower, Rahar Gadda Dhariya, Flat No 03/A, Bhawandaha Jharkhand at Present Resides at Harun Nagar, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mohammad Abu Shajar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 2 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471, 420/34 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, informant and his wife, intended to perform Hajj and when Syed Irshad Ahmad and others co-accused contacted him Syed Irshad Ahmad claimed that he arranges reliable Hajj and Umra tours saying that he is providing good services for Hajj and Umra and when the informant went to their office, they avoided the informant and absconded from their office. The informant further alleged that they had cheated many others in a similar way. 4. Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2976 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 rejected by this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10722 of 2025 vide order dated 12.05.2025 and there is no fresh ground to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 07.05.2024. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected. 6. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the Trial Court after completion of two years in custody. Anand Kr. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T