Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6498 CRL.P No. 6784 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6784 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
MR. AMITAVA SAMANTA S/O LATE SHRI. DILIP KUMAR SAMANTA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS NO.1/2, PURBACAHAL NORTH NIBEDITA ROAD, HALTU PO-HALTU, KOLKATA-700 078. …PETITIONER (BY CAPT. ASHOK NAIK, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
M/S. KURLON LIMITED NO.302, 3RD FLOOR, NORTH BLOCK, MANIPAL CENTER, NO.47, DICKENSON ROAD, BANGALORE-560 042 REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND SECRETARIAL OFFICER MR. S. KRISHNA PRASAD. …RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S. 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.53127/2019 (P.C.R.NO.52438/2019), ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE COURT OF THE XXXIV ADDL.C.M.M., BANGALORE, INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6498 CRL.P No. 6784 of 2020
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation, even when the matter is passed over twice and again called at 2.43 pm.
The petition is of the year 2020.
The matter is listed for the seventh time for compliance of office objections, even though office objections are not complied with.
The order sheet dated 06.06.2025 reads as under:
" There is no representation for the petitioner. As a last chance, two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, necessary orders will be passed."
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
BH : List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2