- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21695 CRL.RP No. 205 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.205 OF 2026 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI NITHIN KAILADY S/O GOPALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT MOOKAMBIKA CONDIMENTS AND HOTEL RAMA REDDY CIRCLE, KUDLU GRAMA BENGALURU-560 068. &PETITIONER (BY SMT. GOWRAMMA G.N., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI RAGHAVENDRA SHETTY S/O SANJEEV SHETTY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.09, MADIVALA MARUTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 079. &RESPONDENT (BY SRI. H.PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 31.01.2023 PASSED IN CC.NO.14965/2018 BY THE LEARNED XIX ACMM, AT BENGALURU AND CONFIRMED IN CRL.A.NO.279/2023 DATED 02.12.2025 BY THE LEARNED LXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-69) AT BENGALURU. Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21695 CRL.RP No. 205 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Demand draft in a sum of Rs.2,10,000/- is tendered by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner to the respondent. Same is acknowledged in the order sheet. 2. A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner which reads as under: <The counsel for the petitioner humble to pray to this Hon9ble High Court of Karnataka. The petitioner pay the balance amount of Rs.3,50,000/- (3 lakh 50 thousand) pay the instalment of 6th month time pay the monthly 5th day of every month. 05.06.2026 Rs.58,333/- 05.07.2026 Rs.58,333/- 05.08.2026 Rs.58,333/- 05.09.2026 Rs.58,333/- 05.10.2026 Rs.58,333/- 05.11.2026 Rs.58,333/- Dates no mis the dates of pay the mount, please consider the this joint memo, consider the this memo in the interest of justice and equity.= - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21695 CRL.RP No. 205 of 2026 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed 8no objection9 on the memo. 4. Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 5. The amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification, if not already withdrawn. 6. It is made clear that, if any one of the installment as agreed in the memo is not paid, revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court. SD/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 41