IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1670 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2025 Thana- Bahoranpur District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Yadav S/O Dhanji Yadav @ Dhanaji Yadav Resident of Charghat, P.S.- Bahoranpur, District- Bhojpur at Ara ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bahoranpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is of causing assault by means of lathi over the head of the informant which resulted into serious injury; besides the allegation against the co-accused person of snatching a golden jitiya to the tune of rupees twenty five thousand. 4. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that both the parties are next door Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1670 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 neighbour and in fact, on account of a trifle, entered into a scuffle, resulting into some unfortunate injuries. So far the injury which is allegedly sustained to the informant is concerned, the learned Sessions Judge has discussed the same in the impugned order and stated that only a lacerated wound measuring two inches was found on the head, however the nature of the injury has not been disclosed, however, on instruction, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the said injury is simple in nature. The petitioner is a man of fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the Court. 5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the pre-arrest bail application and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of causing assault and the corresponding injury over the head clearly suggest the complicity of the petitioner in the crime. 6. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the genesis of the occurrence coupled with the submissions advanced by learned Advocate for the petitioner that the injury is found to be simple in nature, besides the fair antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1670 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 subject to the injury being simple in nature before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Bahoranpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. supratim/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T