Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47208 (PAT)

Amit Ranjan Tiwari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./1106/2026 · 2026-01-28

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1106 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2025 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Amit Ranjan Tiwari Son of Ramdev Tiwari Village -Champapur PS -Ramgarhwa, Dist- East champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 74, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner, along with co-accused Sujeet Tiwari, repeatedly assaulted son of informant with lathi. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. On account of old land dispute, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1106 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with co-accused Sujeet Tiwari, assaulted son of informant with lathi due to which he sustained grievous injuries. Petitioner has got two criminal antecedents. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T