- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4438 RSA No. 472 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 472 OF 2024 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. B. M. ARUN KUMAR @ THOTAPPA S/O LATE MALLESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 2. SMT. INDIRAMMA W/O BHARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 3. SMT. SUVARNAMMA W/O ANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS THE PETITIONERS ARE R/AT #26/C, KUNTAJI BASAVESHWARA BUILDING, C G HOSPITAL, P J EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE - 577 005. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI BASAVARAJU D.P., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. (a) SMT. SHARADAMMA DEAD BY LRS., SMT .GEETHA W/O LATE GANESH RAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS HOUSEWIFE (b) SANJU S/O LATE GANESH RAO Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4438 RSA No. 472 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS BUSINESSMAN THE RESPONDENTS NO.1(a) & (b) ARE R/O MARADIKOPPA - 581 401, SIRSI, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT. (C) B K BABU RAO @ SHANTHAKUMAR S/O KOTRAPPA @ SHIVAJI RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS BUSINESSMAN R/A NO.723/1, 11TH CROSS TRISHUL TALKIES ROAD K B EXTENSION DAVANAGERE - 577 002. 2. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE MALLESHAPPA MAJOR 3. SMT. KAVITHA D/O LATE MALLESHAPPA MAJOR THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE RESIDING AT 31/2, KUNTAJJI BASAVESHWARA BUILDING C G HOSPITAL, P J EXTENSION DAVANAGERE - 577 005. 4. SRI MANOHARA FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN MAJOR, BUSINESSMAN MAYASHRI BAR AND RESTAURANT NO.27/1, C G HOSPITAL ROAD P J EXTENSION DAVANAGERE - 577 005. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.12.2023 PASSED IN RA NO. 19/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.12.2011 PASSED IN OS NO. 347/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, AND ETC., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4438 RSA No. 472 of 2024 THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14