Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47173 (MAD)

Sasikumar v. The State rep by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/17741/2026 · 2026-07-09

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 17741 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 17741 of 2026 Sasikumar S/o. Veerakumar, No.1/345, Kuttai Street, Neelambur, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by the Inspector of Police Palladam Police Station, Tiruppur District. Crime No.504 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under section 483 of BNSS, 2023 to enlarge the Petitioner on bail, pending investigation of the case in the Crime No.504 of 2026, on the file of the Respondent and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Vijaya Ragavan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 8 (c) and 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.504 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17741 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 2. The case of the prosecution is that based on the secret information, the respondent police went to the place of occurrence and found that the petitioner was found in possession of 1.200 kgs of ganja. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and fairly submitted that the petitioner was in possession of 1.200 kgs of ganja which comes under intermediate quantity. He further submitted that the entire contraband was recovered from the petitioner and that there is no previous case pending against him. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. 6. From the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and taking into consideration of the above averment of the learned Government https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17741 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the firm view that it is appropriate to consider the bail application of the petitioner as the quantity comes under intermediate one and also considering the duration of incarceration of the petitioner since 06.06.2026, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, Tiruppur District, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m, until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17741 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 09-07-2026 DRL Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, Tiruppur District. 2. The Inspector of Police Palladam Police Station, Tiruppur District. 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore, 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17741 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 17741 of 2026 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis