Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4716 (KAR)

MURALI R K v. SRI CHIKKAVENKATAGIRI P

CRL.RP/1614/2025 · 2026-04-16

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20858 CRL.RP No. 1614 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1614 OF 2025 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) BETWEEN: MURALI R K S/O. CHIKKA KAVERAPPA (ANGADI), AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT RAMPURA VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU-560 049. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATISH G.S, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI CHIKKAVENKATAGIRI P S/O LATE H. PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT. NO.81, RAMPURA VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU-560 049. &RESPONDENT (BY SMT. SUMA K, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND FINE IMPOSED BY THE ADDL. CJM, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU PASSED IN C.C.NO.20846/2021 DATED 25.06.2024 AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER IN CRL.A.NO.90/2024 VIDE ORDER DATED 30.07.2025 BY I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL AT BENGALURU. Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20858 CRL.RP No. 1614 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Revision petitioner has tendered cash in a sum of Rs.1,30,000/- to the respondent. Same is acknowledged in the order sheet. 2. Joint memo is filed by the learned counsel for the parties, which reads as under: <1. The Respondent had filed a case against the Petitioner U/s 138 of NI Act in C.C No. 20846/2021 and the Petitioner was convicted and was ordered to pay a sum of Rs.7,70,000/-(Rupees Seven Lakh Seventy Thousand only) as a fine amount and in default to undergo a simple imprisonment for a period of three months. 2. The Petitioner filed an appeal against the order of the Trial Court before the Appellant court and the appellant court confirmed the order of the Trial Court in Crl A No. 90/2025. 3. The Petitioner and the Respondent have now amicably settled the matter and has resolved the issued between them, the conditions of the settlement are as follows:- - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20858 CRL.RP No. 1614 of 2025 a) The Petitioner and the Respondent have mutually agreed to settle the matter for a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only) b) The Petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.6,00,000/-(Rupees Six Lakhs only) in four instalments, the Petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.1,30,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Thousand only) on 16.04.2026 by way of cash c) The Petitioner has agreed to pay Second instalment to the Respondent Rs.1,70,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Seventy Thousand only) on 16.06.2026, by way of online transfer directly to the Respondent bank account. d) The Petitioner has agreed to pay the third instalment to the Respondent Rs. 1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) on 16.08.2026, by way of online transfer directly to the Respondent bank account e) The Petitioner has agreed to pay Forth instalment to the Respondent Rs. 1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) on 16.10.2026, by way of online transfer directly to the Respondent bank account. 4. This Joint Memo is executed on the own will of the parties without any coercion, fraud or undue influence. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20858 CRL.RP No. 1614 of 2025 5. It is submitted that, the Petitioner agreed to pay the agreed amount to the Respondent this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass the judgment as per this joint memo. In default of the joint memo conditions this Hon'ble court may be pleased to pass the judgement in the interest of justice. Wherefore we humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to consider this Joint Memo and pass the necessary judgment in the interest of justice.= 3. Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 4. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. 5. It is made clear that, if any one of the installment as agreed in the memo is not paid, revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court. SD/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 36