Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4715 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD AZHAR S/O SHRI MOHAMMAD YUSUF v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4115/2026 · 2026-03-25

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12518] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous III Bail Application No. 4115/2026 Mohammad Azhar S/o Shri Mohammad Yusuf, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 29A, Maulana Azad Nagr, Ramgarh Road, Nai Ki Thadi, Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor, At Present Plot No. 346A, Modern Colony, Nai Ki Thadi, Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur. (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Asgar Khan Mr. Junaid Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/03/2026 1. The present 3rd bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Mohammad Azhar S/o Shri Mohammad Yusuf seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.331/2024 dated 07.08.2024 registered at P.S. Jaisinghpura Khor, District - Jaipur, for the offence under Sections 103(1) & 238(a) of BNS. 2. During course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date only 8 witnesses were examined before the trial Court and the trial Court is at a snail’s pace and at current rate, it will take several years to complete trial. 3. Considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties. [2026:RJ-JP:12518] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4115/2026] 4. The instant third bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file at any subsequent stage. 5. The trial Court is directed to ensure that all material witnesses are examined in another three months' time and all endeavour be made to conclude the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 6. The trial Court shall not adjourn the case except on a written request from the counsel. 7. Learned Public Prosecutor is directed to instruct the concerned SHO to ensure that service of summons or any other process, if issued by the trial Court shall be served without any delay. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/20