Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:MHC:2653 HCP No. 1047 of 2026 __________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN HCP No. 1047 of 2026 Srinivasan S/o.Muthu, Residing at No.1/42A Samikannu Street, Adanur Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu-632317. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai. 2. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Arni Taluk Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Cr.No.175 of 2026. 3. Ramesh S/o.Ruthramoorthy, Samikannu Street, Adanur Tiruvannamalai, Tamilnadu-632317. ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus or order or direction in the nature of writ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2026:MHC:2653 HCP No. 1047 of 2026 __________ directing the 2nd respondent herein to produce the petitioner’s Wife Suganya aged 41 years, in person before this Hon’ble court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Sunil Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) One Srinivasan, husband of Suganya (detenue) has filed this habeas corpus petition directing the second respondent to produce her. 2. A perusal of the affidavit reveals that he had reasons to suspect that the detenue was having a relationship with R3. The petitioner had filed a complaint before the Inspector of Police, Arani Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District and a case in Crime No. 175 of 2026 had been registered under the head ‘woman missing’. The present petition has been instituted since police had not reported any progress in securing the detenue. 3. Today when the matter is called, the detenue is produced in Court by the authorities. Mr.Mohamed Riyaz, shows us a copy of the Aadhar card of detenue wherein her date of birth is mentioned as https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2026:MHC:2653 HCP No. 1047 of 2026 __________ 06.06.1992 making her 34 years of age as on date. Incidentally, the affidavit filed in this petition stated that the detenue is 41 years. 4. We have interacted with the detenue, who states that she does not want to return to her matrimonial home on account of differences and domestic violence from her husband.
In light of her age and the fact that the detenue is categoric that she has not been illegally detained against her will and has voluntarily left the matrimonial home, there is nothing further to be adjudicated in this petition. 5. Recording the above, we close this habeas corpus petition. No costs. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 10-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes SSM To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Arni Taluk Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2026:MHC:2653 HCP No. 1047 of 2026 __________ DR.ANITA SUMANTH J. AND SUNDER MOHAN J. SSM HCP No. 1047 of 2026 10-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis