- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5921 WP No. 7179 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 7179 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI. ANANTH SHESHA H.N, S/O NAGANNA H.N, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1201, A BLOCK, PLATINUM CITY, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU - 560 022. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GURUDHATTA K, ADVOCATE) AND: KARNATAKA BANK LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED HEAD OFFICE AT MAHAVEERA CIRCLE, PB NO. 599, KANKANADY, MANGALURU - 575 002 AND BRANCH OFFICE AT GUBBI BRANCH, KH NO.3083/2821, GROUND FLOOR, B H ROAD, GUBBI, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 216, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, SRI CHANDRAKANATH H.J, …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NITHIN CHANDRA M, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5921 WP No. 7179 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL -2 BANGALORE IN OS NO. 63/2022 DATED 09.01.2025 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-J AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present petition is filed seeking the following prayer: “Wherefore the petitioner respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order passed by the learned Debt Recovery Tribunal-2, Bangalore in O.A.No.63/2022 dated 09.01.2025 marked as Annexure-J; ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Hon'ble DTR-2, Bangalore to allow the application bearing IA No.2224/2023, filed by the petitioner herein dated 13.11.2023 vide Annexure-G. iii) Issue such other directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case and allow the above writ petition with costs, to meet the ends of justice and equity." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5921 WP No. 7179 of 2025 2. The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, at Bengaluru in O.S.No.63/2022, dated 09.01.2025. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any of the orders that are passed by the DRT-II, the remedy available to the petitioner is not before this Court but before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Hence, this Court is passing the following: ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy is in accordance with law. ii. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12