Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4707 (JHR)

BABLU YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11684/2025 · 2026-02-27

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5898 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11684 of 2025 Bablu Yadav s/o Hardayal Yadav aged about 29 years, bearing Aadhr no. 755173088477, r/o vill-Bangawan @ Bangoan, P.O. Burmu, P.S.-Burmu, Distt.-Ranchi ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jawahar Sah, Advocate Ms. Sonali Suman, Advocate For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P --- 04/27.02.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No. 313 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 109, 61(2), 3(5) of B.N.S, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated only on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he is having no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He lastly submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this Court. 4. Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the Petitioner. 5. Having regard to the allegation made against this petitioner, coupled with the fact that there is no recovery from him and he is also having no criminal antecedent, it transpires from para 174 of the case diary and also the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2025; hence, I am inclined to enlarge the Petitioner 2026:JHHC:5898 2 on bail. Accordingly, the above-named Petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Ratu P. S. Case No. 313 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the Petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this Petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this Petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 27th February, 2026 jk Uploaded on 27/02/2026