Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47063 (KAR)

H R SUNIL v. SMT S PALLAVI

WP/6623/2022 · 2026-01-30

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5318 WP No. 6623 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 6623 OF 2022 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: H.R. SUNIL S/O RAJU S.K AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT HONNAGANAHALLY VILALGE KASABA HOBI, MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 572 111. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MUDDURAJA N, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SMT. S. PALLAVI W/O H.R. SUNIL D/O SIDDARAMU (RETIRED TEACHER) R/O AT 5TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK NEAR AJEE TEMPLE, V V NAGAR KALLAHALLY, MANDYA CITY - 572 111. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27/11/2021 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-D PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MANDYA ON IA NO-1 FILED IN MC 124/2021 AND ETC., Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5318 WP No. 6623 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER No representation on petitioner's side on call. On 20.01.2026, following order was passed. "No representation on petitioner's side on call. As per office endorsement, requisites were not furnished for sending notice to respondent. Therefore, list the matter on 30.01.2026 under the caption for dismissal". Even on passing the aforementioned order, the petitioner did not choose to represent. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18