Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47058 (KAR)

SRI. BASAVARAJU v. SOMEGOWDA DEAD BY HIS LRS SMT. RUDRAMMA

RSA/399/2024 · 2026-01-09

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1470 RSA No. 399 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 399 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI BASAVARAJU S/O LATE EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 2. SRI HALAPPA S/O LATE EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 3. SMT JAYAMMA D/O LATE EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 4. SRI NINGARAJU S/O LATE EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 5. SMT SUNANDA W/O SOMASHEKARA D/O LATE EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS ALL ARE R/A SHANKARADEVARA PETE KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TQ, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115. APPELLANTS 1, 3, 4 & 5 ARE REP BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SRI HALAPPA, THE APPELLANT NO.2 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VIJAYA KRISHNA BHAT M.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1470 RSA No. 399 of 2024 AND: 1. SOMEGOWDA DEAD BY HIS LRS SMT. RUDRAMMA W/O LATE SOMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 2. SMT. BHAGYA D/O LATE SOMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 3. SMT.SUSHEELA D/O LATE SOMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 4. SMT.PREMA D/O LATE SOMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 5. SRI PUTTARAJU S/O LATE SOMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 6. SMT.GIRIJA D/O LATE SOMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 7. SMT.LATHA D/O LATE SOMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 8. SRI SURESHA D/O LATE SOMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 9. SRI MALLEGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS SMT.PUTTAMMA W/O LATE MALLEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 10. SMT.NAGARATHNA D/O LATE MALLEGOWDA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1470 RSA No. 399 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 11. SMT.SOWBHAGYA D/O LATE MALLEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 12. SRI BASAVARAJU S/O LATE MALLEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 13. SRI RUDRESHA S/O LATE MALLEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS ALL ARE R/A SHANKARADEVARA PETE KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.12.2023 PASSED IN RA.NO.1/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.11.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.25/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC, BELUR AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1470 RSA No. 399 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for IV time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 38