Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4705 (JHR)

PANCHU ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2262/2026 · 2026-03-23

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8002 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2262 of 2026 Panchu Ansari, aged about 40 years, son of Tahanju Miyan @ Dehnaju Miyan, resident of Vill-Loharbandha, P.O. & P.S. Karmatar, Dist. Jamtara, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Advocate --- 02/23rd March 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Ahilyapur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2022 for the offence registered under Section 392 of IPC, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Giridih. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor there is any recovery from the petitioner and the petitioner has not even been put under TIP. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2025. He has also referred to the statement made in paragraph 14 of the bail application and submitted that apart from this case, the petitioner has two more cases, in which he has been enlarged on bail. 3. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that as per the confessional statement of the co-accused, the petitioner is the mastermind in connection with the occurrence. 4. To this, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that three co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 21.06.2022 in B.A. No. 5295/2022 and vide order dated 03.06.2022 in B.A. No. 5713/2022. 2026:JHHC:8002 2 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that co-accused have been enlarged on bail and that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused and the petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2025, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty- Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Giridih in connection with Ahilyapur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2022, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 23.03.2026 Uploaded On: 25.03.2026 Mukul/-