LOKESH KUMAR MEENA S/O SHRI GHANSHYAM PRASAD MEENA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/992/2026 · 2026-03-05
Anil Kumar Upman
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4704 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4704 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9628] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 992/2026
1. Lokesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ghanshyam Prasad Meena, R/o Ratanpura, Lalsot, District Dausa.
2. Dilip Kumar Meena S/o Shri Kailash Meena, R/o Bagri, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa.
3. Siyaram Meena S/o Shri Kishan Lal Meena, R/o Bagri, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa.
4. Vinod Meena S/o Shri Kanjiram Meena, R/o Daroga Wali Dhani, Suratpura, Mandari, District Dausa.
5. Sapna Meena D/o Shrighanshyam Meena, R/o Opp. Petrol Pump, Mandawari, District Dausa. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2. Sher Singh Meena S/o Ramsingh Meena, R/o Sukar, Bamanwas, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anju Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Ashok Kumar Bairwa, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 05/03/2026
1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.621/2022 registered at Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East), for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 365 & 379 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.
[2026:RJ-JP:9628] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-992/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor places verification report dated 20.02.2026 received from the SHO, Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East). According to which, parties have entered into compromise. The said report is taken on record.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.621/2022 registered at Police Station Kho- Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /48