Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15761 M.F.A. No.3951/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3951/2020 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. VANI W/O LATE ADESH .Y AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS.
2.
SRI. YATTEGOWDA S/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
3.
SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O YATTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
ALL ARE R/AT YALACHAVADI VILLAGE MARALAVADI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DIST-562117.
&APPELLANTS (BY MS. NITYA, ADV., FOR MR. PRAKASH M.H. ADV.,)
AND:
1.
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., GOLDEN HEIGHTS 4TH FLOOR NO.1/2 59TH CROSS 4TH M BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560 010 REP BY ITS MANAGER.
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15761 M.F.A. No.3951/2020
2.
SRI. NAGARAJU .E S/O LATE ERA CHENNAPPA MAJOR R/AT NO.85, BUKKASAGARA VILLAGE ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE-560 083
&RESPONDENTS (BY MR. MAHESWARA S, AND MR. B. PRADEEP, ADVS., FOR R1 NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.10.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO.2955/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL SCJ AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU SCCH-5, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the claimants challenging the
judgment and award dated 01.10.2019 passed in MVC No.2955/2019 by the VIII Additional Small Causes Judge and ACMM and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru (SCCH-5) (for short, 8Tribunal9).
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15761 M.F.A. No.3951/2020
2. Though this appeal is listed for admission, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up for final disposal.
3. Miss Nitya, learned counsel for Sri.Prakash M.H., learned counsel for the appellants-claimants submits that the Tribunal has erred in assessing the income of the deceased at Rs.10,000/- p.m. by ignoring the fact that the deceased was an agriculturalist having 10 acres of agricultural land and used to earn more than Rs.15,000/- p.m. Hence, he seeks to re-assess the income of the deceased by allowing the appeal.
4. Per contra, Sri.Maheswara S., learned counsel for Sri.B.Pradeep, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 supports the impugned judgment and award of the Tribunal and submits that no evidence was placed before the Tribunal with regard to the income and therefore, the Tribunal was justified in assessing the income and the
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15761 M.F.A. No.3951/2020
compensation awarded is just and proper. Hence, he seeks to dismiss the appeal.
5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is to be noticed that the wife and the parents of the deceased filed a claim petition seeking the compensation. Admittedly, no evidence was placed before the Tribunal to substantiate the income of the deceased. Hence, the Tribunal has assessed the income of the deceased at Rs.10,000/- p.m. I am of the considered view that in the absence of any proof, the income of the deceased is required to be re-assessed at Rs.14,000/- p.m. placing reliance on the notional income chart prepared by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority. After re-assessing the income of the deceased, the compensation under the head of loss of dependency would be as under: Rs.14,000 + 40% x 12 x 16 - 1/3 = Rs.25,08,800/-
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15761 M.F.A. No.3951/2020
6. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal on other heads remains unaltered. Thus, the appellants would be entitled to the modified compensation as under: HEADS AMOUNT (in Rs.) Loss of dependency 28,08,800 Loss of consortium (40,000 x 3) 1,20,000 Loss of estate 15,000 Funeral expenses 15,000 Total 29,58,800
7. In the result, this Court proceeds to pass the following
ORDER a) The appeal is allowed-in-part. b) The impugned judgment and award dated 01.10.2019 passed by the Tribunal in M.V.C.No.2955/2019 is modified to an extent that the appellants-claimants would be entitled to the total compensation of Rs.29,58,800/-
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15761 M.F.A. No.3951/2020
as against Rs.19,42,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. c) The enhanced compensation shall carry interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realisation. d) The respondent-Insurance Company shall deposit the enhanced compensation amount with accrued interest before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. e) The rest of the judgment and award of the Tribunal with respect to apportionment, deposit and release shall remain unaltered. f) Registry shall transmit the records to the Tribunal forthwith. g) Draw the modified award accordingly.
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
RV/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12