Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:119
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.1245 of 2021 ---- Kamlesh Rautia aged about 40 years son of Late Somra Routia, resident of village Chainpur, P.O.+P.S.- Chainpur, District-Gumla.
…. …. Petitioner(s) Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Additional Collector, Gumla, P.O.+P.S.- Gumla, District-Gumla.
3. Circle Officer, Chainpur, P.O.+P.S.- Chainpur, District – Gumla. 4(a). Bardani Lakra W/o Kamlesh Rautia 4(b). Nupur Baxla, D/o Kamlesh Rautia 4(c). Renukla Baxla, D/o Kamlesh Rautia
4(d). Sapna Baxla, D/o Kamlesh Rautia
All residents of village – Dundriya Darutoli, P.O.+P.S.- Gumla, District-Gumla.
…. …. Respondent(s) ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. Niraj Kr. Mishra, A.C. to G.P.-IV
----
13/Dated: 06th January, 2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:-
“for issuance of appropriate writ/writs,
order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the notice dated 15/2/2021 (Annexure-7) issued by the Circle Officer, Chainpur (Respondent no.3) by which the petitioner has been directed to appear in the court of the respondent no.3 with the documents appertaining to land Chainpur Thana No. 114, Khata No.20, plot No. 1352 area 0.36 acres, so that the said encroached land could be vacated. And the petitioner further prays for issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions calling upon the respondents to show cause as to how and under what circumstances and which authority the respondent no.3 has issued the impugned notice upon the petitioner for vacating the raiyati land of the petitioner. The petitioner further prays for direction upon the respondent no.3 not to interfere in peaceful possession of the petitioner over the land Chainpur Thana No.114, Khata No.20, plot No. 1352 area 0.36 acres.”
2026:JHHC:119
Page | 2
W.P. (C) No.1245 of 2021
2. The impugned notice contained in Annexure-7 reads as under:-
“कायाŊलय, अंचल अिधकारी, चैनपुर गुमला। खास सूचना
नोिटस बनाम
(1) ी बंसत कु मार बाखला िपता ˢ० मनमसीह बाखला, ঁाम डाडुटोली दु̢दुौरया गुमला।
(2) सुखदेव िसंह, चैनपुर
(3) टुकू रौितया, चैनपुर
(4) ी कमलेश रौितया, चैनपुर
(5) राजकु मार ঋसाद िपता िআभुवन ঋसाद, चैनपुर
(6) रायचȾ लकडा िपता ˢ० पतरस लकडा, चैनपुर
(7) ी ौरतेश कु मार गुɑा िपता रिवȾ गुɑा, चैनपुर
(8) सुˆा देवी, चैनपुर।
इस नोिटस Ȫारा सभी को अगाह िकया जाता है िक अपर समाहता१ गुमला का पআांक 16/रा० िदनांक 05.01.2021 Ȫारा ी बंधु ितक५ माननीय िवधायक-सह-पूव१ मंআी झारखਔ रांची से ঋाɑ आवेदन पআ म७ उɎोंन७ आवेिदका शांित सुगन पित ˢ० मनमसीह बाखला, ঁाम चैनपुर डाडू टोली दु̢दुौरया, गुमला। चैनपुर थाना न० 114 के खाता न0 20 ɘॉट न0 1352 रकबा 0.36 एकड़ (छȅीस िडसमील) का आदेश ঋाɑ है। ঋाɑ िनद८श के आलोक म७ जमीन की पैमाईस ঋितवेदन अमीन, रा० उप िनरीक ঋ०अं० िनरीक से ঋाɑ की गयी है। ঋाɑ ঋितवेदन के अनुसार ॿमशः -
(1) राजकु मार ঋसाद िपता िআभुवन ঋसाद ঁाम चैनपुर (अितॿिमत रा० 0.06 िड०) (2) रायचȾ लकडा िपता ˢ० पतरस लकडा ঁाम चैनपुर (0.02िड0) (3) कमलेश रौितया चैनपुर (0.04 िड० मकान िनमा१ण)
विण१त भूिम बंसत बखला का रैयती भूिम को आपलोगों ने कɥा कर िलया है, आपके Ȫारा िकस आधार पर अवैध दखल िकया गया है। उस मूल राजˢ कागजात के साथ िदनांक 19.
02.2021 के पूवा१हन 10.30 बजे अंचल Ɋायालय म७ उप्˕त होना सुिनिʮत कर७ग७।
ी बंसत कु मार बाखला को िनदेश िदया जाता है िक अपने 0.36 (छȅीस, िडसमील) भूिम की मूल दˑावेज अंचल Ɋायालय चैनपुर म७ िनधा१ौरत ितिथ म७ उप्˕त होंग७, तािक इस वाद का िनपटारा करते ॽए अितॿिमत भूिम को खाली कराया जा सके ।
इसे सি तािकद जाने।
अंचल अिधकारी,
चैनपुर, गुमला ।”
3. It is admitted position that it is a private dispute between the two private raiyats but that has been sought to be resolved by using the executive power of a Minister which is otherwise not permissible. The law of a land has to be prevailed not desire of a Minister or any authority. 4. The present notice also does not suggest initiation of any proceeding or any legal provision under which such notice has been issued. The said notice has not been even docketed. 5. Thus, the impugned notice is nothing but misuse of the power. 2026:JHHC:119
Page | 3
W.P. (C) No.1245 of 2021
6. In view of above discussion, the impugned notice (Annexure-7) is not acceptable in our legal system, accordingly, it is hereby quashed and set aside. 7. However, the parties are at liberty to work out their remedies in accordance with law. 8. The present writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 06th January, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 07.01.2026