- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19281 RSA No. 3238 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 3238 OF 2007 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI THOPEGOWDA S/O MAYASHETTIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. SRI CHANNE GOWDA S/O MAYASHETTIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 3. SRI SHANTHAMMA W/O LATE.MAYANNAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 4. SMT RENUKA D/O LATE.MAYANNAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 5. SRI RAGHU S/O LATE.MAYANNAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 6. SMT GAYITHRI D/O LATE.MAYANNAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS 7. SMT INDIRA D/O LATE.MAYANNAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT KATHANAHALLI VILLAGE HIRISAVE HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 101 &APPELLANTS (APPELLANTS ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19281 RSA No. 3238 of 2007 AND: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. SRI K M GANGADHARAN S/O MAYASHETTIGOWDA R-1 DEAD. VIDE ORDER DATED 5.12.2012 R-2 IS L.R. OF R-1. SMT PUTTAMMA @ CHANNAMMA W/O LATE.MAYASHETTIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT.KATHANAHALLI VILLAGE HIRISAVE HOBLI,CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 01 SMT SAROJA W/O GANGADHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT SASALAGERE VILLAGE NUGGEHALLI HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 01 SMT YASHODHA W/O GANGADHARA D/O MAYASHETTIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT KATHANAHALLI VILLAGE HIRISAVE HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 101 SMT RAJAMMA W/O SANJEEVA D/O MAYASHETTIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT JOGIPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI,CHANNARAYAPATNATALUK HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 101 & RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19281 RSA No. 3238 of 2007 (R2 TO R5 ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED R-2 IS L.R 0F R-1 V.O.D 05.12.2012) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.11.2006 PASSED IN RA.NO.529/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.DISTRICT JUDGE, HASSAN, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.07.2005 PASSED IN OS.NO.125/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) C.R.PATNA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of appellants when the case is called at 04.09 p.m. Learned counsel for respondents is also not present. 2. On perusal of the order dated 6.1.2026 passed in the present appeal, it is seen that learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo for retirement enclosing the acknowledgment for having served notice to the appellants and this Court accepted the said memo and permitted the learned counsel for appellants to retire from the case and directed the office to show the name of appellants in the cause list. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19281 RSA No. 3238 of 2007 Accordingly, office has shown the names of appellants in the cause list. 3. Despite the same, there is no representation by the appellants either by themselves or through their counsel. It appears that the appellants are not interested in proceeding further in the matter. 4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE GSS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57