Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4703 (CHH)

SMT. RUPNI DEVI v. SUDEEP BECK

MAC/747/2026 · 2026-03-18

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13334 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 747 of 2026 1. Smt. Rupni Devi W/o Late Ghuran Gop, aged about 61 years R/o Village Manjhitoli, Police Station Raidih District- Gumla (Jharkhand) 2. Manchan Beck S/o Kaharu Beck, aged about 36 years R/o Village Bargaon Tahsil And District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Appellants/Claimant) versus 1. Sudeep Beck S/o Jagdav Beck Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Manjhitoli Police Station Raidih District- Gumal (Jharkhand R/o Narayanpur (Chirwari) Post Aara, Tahsil And District- Jashpur (C.G.) (Owner) 2. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Local Branch Vahan Bima Kendra, Gamhariya Road Tahsil And District- Jashpur (C.G.) Divisional Office Shivmohan Bhawan, Vidhansabha Marg, Pandri, Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) (Insurer) ... Respondents For appellants : Shri Divyanand Patel For Respondents : (Honb’le Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput) Order on Board dated 19.03.2026 Challenge in this appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the “MV Act”) by the appellants/claimants is to the award dated 03.02.2026 passed by the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh in Claim Case No. 02/2024. 2 2. Claim Application under Section 166 of the MV Act was filed by the appellant/claimants inter alia seeking compensation on account of death of Akash Beck in a road accident which took place on 09.02.2023 at Gumla, Jharkhand. Said application was rejected by the Tribunal holding that cause of action had not arisen in its jurisdiction and for that the application was not maintainable. 3. After arguing for some time, counsel for the appellants submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a duly constituted claim application under Section 166 MV Act before the jurisdictional Claims Tribunal. 4. The appeal is therefore dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Jyotishi AVANISH JYOTISHI Digitally signed by AVANISH JYOTISHI Date: 2026.03.23 17:33:48 +0530