Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6964 RSA No. 343 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.343 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. LALITHAMMA, W/O LATE PAPANNAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
2.
SRI. AJITH PRASAD MANJU, S/O LATE PAPANNAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
3.
SRI. BANUPRAKASH, S/O LATE PAPANNAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
4.
SRI. THIMMEGOWDA S/O LATE PAPANNAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT ANKASANDRA VILLAGE, CHELUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAJANNA G K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
SRI. SHIVANNA, S/O LATE UGRAPPA @ UGRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHETTIHALLI VILLAVGE, HAGALAWADI HOBLI,
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6964 RSA No. 343 of 2025
GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
2.
SRI. NAGARAJA, S/O LATE SHESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT HAVALGEREHATTI HANDANAKERE HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
3.
SRI. HITESH, S/O LATE MELEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT CHELUR VILLAGE, CHELUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO AWARD COST OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER/S AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANTS UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANTS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL ORDER This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 4th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6964 RSA No. 343 of 2025
hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
PSG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7