Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4699 (CHH)

KUNJBIHARI DADSENA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4561/2019 · 2026-03-18

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13145 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4561 of 2019 Kunjbihari Dadsena, S/o. Late Shri Dhansai Dadsena, Aged About 57 Years, R/o. Village - Khurspar, Post - Sirko, Tahsil - Pithora, Police Station - Basnai, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector, Office Of Collectorate (Land Record), Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Office Of S D O, Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer ASHOK SAHU Digitally signed by ASHOK SAHU Date: 2026.03.19 16:25:10 +0530 2 (Single Bench) Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 19.03.2026 1. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties that the suspension of the petitioner has been revoked and the petitioner has already been retired from service, therefore, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. However, the petitioner’s grievance, if any, still subsists, he is at liberty to make a representation before the competent authority within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the competent authority is directed to decide the representation, if any, filed by the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of representation. 2. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Ashok Judge