HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35577 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Saumitra Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri A.P.Paul for respondent no.4, Mohd. Afzal for respondent no.5 and Sri R.P.Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel. 2. Petitioner has claimed to be a part of consortium and he is aggrieved that one of the partners has filed a revision petition under the provisions of Section 41 (3) of Urban Planning and Development Act, which was allowed by the Revisional Authority i.e. State. 3. Now petitioner is aggrieved that said revision petition was filed without taking their consent and they are objecting its outcome therefore, present writ petition has been filed. 4. Court finds that it is an inter-se dispute between the partners of consortium which cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction. 5. It has been informed that one of the partners of consortium has already filed a Writ Petition No.31068 of 2023 for implementation of the impugned order which is pending before Division Bench of this Court wherein the petitioner has already filed an application for intervention and has all opportunity to raise his legally permissible contention before the Division Bench, therefore, there is no legal ground to entertain this writ petition. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to raise all his legally permissible submissions before Division Bench in the pending writ petition. September 9, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saumitra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gaurang Dwivedi, Mohd. Afzal (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) M/S Silver City Infratech Private Limited .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad