Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46970 (CAL)

BRIJ MOHAN PRASAD v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

WPA/1663/2026 · 2026-10-06

Suvra Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION 06.10.2026 rc/ct.no.CB-06 Item No.08 WPA No. 1663 of 2026 Brij Mohan Prasad Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Adv. Debarshi Dhar Adv. Jonaki Saha …for the petitioner Adv. Rajni Singh Dev Adv. Tuhin Kumar Roy … for the State Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner and a copy of reasoned order passed by the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Kalimpong are taken on record. On prayer of the petitioner, liberty is granted to correct the nomenclature of the 4th respondent in the cause title of the application. The petitioner seeks to exercise option under the West Bengal Recognised Non-Government Educational Institution Employees (Death-cum-Retirement Benefit) Scheme, 1981 and submitted a representation in this regard before the concerned authority. During pendency of the writ petition, the representation was considered and turned down. The petitioner seeks to challenge the said order in accordance with law. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the District Inspector of Schools 2 (SE), Kalimpong on May 19, 2026, in accordance with law, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit has been invited, allegations contained in the writ petition shall be deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh,J)