Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46957 (CAL)

SUSANTA SAHA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRR/3673/2026 · 2026-10-01

Kausik Chanda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01.10.2026 Sl. No.32 Ct. No.237 S.A. CRR 3673 of 2026 Susanta Saha -vs- The State of West Bengal Mr. Milon Mukherjee, ld. Sr. Adv. Mr. Smartajit Sarker …for the petitioner Mr. Aditya Tiwari Ms. Namrata Chatterjee …for the State Let a copy of the application be made over to Mr. Aditya Tiwari, learned advocate appearing for the State. It has been submitted by Mr. Milon Mukherjee, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner, that a warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Krishnagar, Nadia, in connection with G.R. Case No. 842 of 1987, arising out of Nadia Kotwali Police Station Case No. 5 of 1987 dated June 3, 1987, under Sections 467/468/471/473/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. It is submitted that the petitioner is presently aged about 81 years. Due to a communication gap between the petitioner and his learned advocate before the trial court, the petitioner could not appear before the learned Magistrate in the court below. Mr. Milon Mukherjee, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is, however, willing and prepared to surrender before the learned Magistrate. In view of the aforesaid submission, the warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner is stayed for a period of two months from the 2 date of this order, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall surrender before the learned Magistrate within the said period. In the event the petitioner surrenders before the learned Magistrate within the stipulated period, any application for bail filed by him shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, uninfluenced by any observation made in this order. In the event the petitioner fails to surrender in terms of this order within the stipulated period, the warrant of arrest shall stand revived automatically, and the learned Magistrate shall be at liberty to execute the same in accordance with law. Accordingly, CRR 3673 of 2026 is disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.)