Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4695 (JHR)

SURAJ KUMAR BHAGAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./980/2026 · 2026-02-27

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5985 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 980 of 2026 --------- Suraj Kumar Bhagat aged about 25 years S/o Shiv Bhagat R/o Village-Irro Phatakpur P.O. & P.S.-Gumla District-Gumla (Jharkhand). ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshari, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-27.02.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Section 309(4) of BNS 2023 and subsequently added Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and only on the allegation that the location of the telephone of the petitioner was around the place of occurrence, the petitioner has been arrested and also the TIP was done after one year. He further submits that the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 29.09.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has been taken into custody on the basis of telephone tower location and also that the petitioner is in custody since 29.09.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Gumla in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 423/24. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) FEBRUARY 27, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 28.02.2026