[2026:RJ-JP:15255] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4213/2026 Mukesh Rohila S/o Sanwarmal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. 86, Near Durg, Panch Batti, Udaipurwati, Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, Presently R/o House No. 156A, Alkapuri, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 10/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.195/2025, registered at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur City (North), for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(2) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also contended that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the petitioner is in custody since long and trial/investigation may take considerable time. It is further contended that the petitioner has not marked his signature in the disputed agreement the Police has also not verified the fact through FSL as to whether petitioner has [2026:RJ-JP:15255] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4213/2026] executed the agreement with the complainant or not, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner deceived the complainant by executing an agreement in his favour regarding the disputed property and has obtained an amount of Rs.40,00,000/- in cash. In the investigation it was affirmed that the petitioner has executed the agreement before the two attesting witnesses and the agreement was notrized by notary public officer Mr. Rajendra Yadav. Furthermore, the investigation also reveals that the same plot was also sold to other person Vishal in the year 2022, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-44