MOHAMMED USMAN SAHEB v. TENKANDIYUR GRAM PANCHAYATH
WP/35089/2018 · 2026-01-06
Suraj Govindaraj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46926 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46926 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:394 WP No. 35089 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 35089 OF 2018 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED USMAN SAHEB S/O USTHAD MOHIDDIEN SAHIB, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, DAR-E-SALAM HOUSE, KODAVOOR VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT PIN-576 108. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. T. MOHANDAS SHETTY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
TENKANDIYUR GRAM PANCHAYATH UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT PINCODE-576 106, REP. BY PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
2.
THE EXECTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT PIN-576 106. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASANNA V.R., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. ASHOK S. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO: (A) QUASH THE
ORDER/RESOLUTION PASSED BY TINKANIDYOOR GRAMA
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:394 WP No. 35089 of 2018
PANCHAYATH, THE 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN DATED 30.03.2017, VIDE ANNEXURE-L; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Despite the order dated 16.12.2025, none appears for the petitioner and the cost is also not paid.
2. The petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 76