Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4692 (GAU)

FORIDUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./738/2026 · 2026-04-23

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010051052026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./738/2026 FORIDUL ISLAM SON OF TASHLIMUDDIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-GUNIALGURI, P.S.- KALGACHIA, DISTRICT- BARPETA,ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA, MR A B SIDDIQUE,MR N AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 24.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. TCR called for has been received. Page No.# 2/2 3. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, for granting regular bail to the petitioner, who was arrested in connection with Kalgachia P.S. Case No. 150/2025, under Section 21(b) of the ND&PS Act, 1985. 4. This is a charge-sheeted matter, and the petitioner, vide order dated 18.03.2026, was granted interim bail, considering the fact that the petitioner was arrested from the vicinity of his own residence and there was no allegation of any recovery of contraband from the petitioner's home. 5. Having regard to the nature of the allegations against the present petitioner and the fact that the charge sheet has already been submitted, the order of interim bail is hereby made absolute on the same terms and conditions as contained in the order of interim bail dated 18.03.2026. 6. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant