Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46912 (KAR)

M/S. ACUMEN TECHNICAL ADVISORY PVT LTD v. MR.MANISHJ KUMAR SINGH

MFA/1575/2021 · 2026-02-03

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6256 MFA No. 1575 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1575 OF 2021 (CPC) BETWEEN: M/S. ACUMEN TECHNICAL ADVISORY PVT LTD A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.1201, 2ND FLOOR, DIVYA SHAKTI BUILDING, 100 FT ROAD, INDIRANAGAR, HAL 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560038 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND CEO MR ALOK ANAND …APPELLANT (BY SMT. ROSE JOY, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. MANEESHA KONGOVI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR.MANISH KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE MR RAM KUMAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.C-006, NCC MEADOWS, DODDBALLAPURA ROAD, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560064 2. MR VAIBHAV CHHABRA LATE MR INDER PATEL CHHABRA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, G-805, TOWERG, 8TH FLOOR, VVIP ADDRESS, RAJ NAGAR EXTENSION, N H 58, GHAZIBAD, UTTAR PRADESH-201017 Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6256 MFA No. 1575 of 2021 3. MTA SERVICES LLP INCORPORATED UNDER THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.15, NEW GANDHI NAGAR, GHAZIABAD, UTTAR PRADESH-201001 REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS PARTNERS …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MONIKA H., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ASHOK G.V., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; SMT. NITYA KALYANI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2; SRI. YASHWANT B. POOJAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAKESH B. BHATT, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Rose Joy., counsel on behalf of Smt.Maneesha Kongovi., for the appellant and Smt.Monika.H., counsel on behalf of Sri.Ashok.G.V., for caveator/ respondent No.1 have appeared in person. Though the petition is listed today for admission, with the consent, it is heard finally. 2. The appeal is filed to set aside the order dated 23.02.2021 passed by the Court of LII Additional City Civil and - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6256 MFA No. 1575 of 2021 Sessions Judge, Bangalore (CCH-53) on IA Nos.2 and 3 in O.S.No.4445 of 2020. 3. Counsel for the appellant submits that a direction may be issued to the Trial Court to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and with the above observation the appeal may be disposed of. 4. Taking note of the said submission, appeal is disposed of and a gentle request is made to the Trial Court to dispose of the suit within an outer limit of one year from the receipt of certified copy of the order and without getting influenced by the observation and the findings recorded in the impugned order. 5. With the above observation, the appeal is disposed of. Parties to co-operate for the speedy disposal of the suit. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27