06.10.2026 Ct. No. 654 Sl. No. 221 Subadip CO 1797 of 2026 Preetam Dutta VS Sumana Dutta Mr. Siddhartha Mukhopadhyay …for the petitioner 1. The instant revisional application has been preferred on behalf of her husband. 2. Being aggrieved by and order directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 10000/- (Ten Thousand only) per month to his wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. 3. The learned Advocate for the petitioner could not show any ground of error of jurisdiction for which the order impugned can be interfered with in the present revisional application. The learned Advocate for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the instant revisional application and prefer an appeal against the order, the petitioner is granted liberty to withdraw the revisional application. The petitioner shall file an appeal against the impugned order and the Appellate Court shall take into consideration, the time spent by the petitioner, pursuing this revisional application. With such directions being C.O. 1797 of 2026 is disposed of. (Aryak Dutt, J.)