Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010082722018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 3678/2018 Between: 1. P.R. MOHAN, S/O. P. TIRUPATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED CONDUCTOR, E. NO.405568, R/O. BANDIATMAPUR, NANDAYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHAIRMANCUMPRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, ALLAGADDA BUS DEPOT, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari call for the records in I.D. No. 92 of 2014 on the file of the Honorable 1st Respondent i.e., Honorable Industrial Tribusal-cum- Labour Court, Anantapuramu and quash the same in so far rejecting the claim 2 VS,J W.P.No.3678 of 2018 of the petitioner and consequently set aside the same by directing the respondent corporation to grant consequent benefits, back wages and attendant benefits to the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.3678 of 2018 ORDER: When the writ petition came up for hearing on 17.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioner, as such, the matter was directed to be posted to 29.06.2026. Even on 29.06.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was posted to 06.07.2026, under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 06.07.2026 Gss Whether the order is : Speaking No Reportable No