Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46895 (KAR)

SRI.NAGANNA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/5937/2025 · 2026-01-09

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1173 WP No. 5937 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 5937 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: 1. SRI NAGANNA S/O LATE LINGE GOWDA @GADDE GOWDA AGED 65 YEARS 2. SRI CHIKKARAJU S/O LATE LINGE GOWDA @GADDE GOWDA AGED 58 YEARS 3. SMT. VEENA.H.R W/O LATE LINGARAJU.G AGED 45 YEARS 4. MADHUSHREE. N D/O LATE LINGARAJU.G AGED 21 YEARS 5. CHINMAYEE D/O LATE LINGARAJU.G AGED 19 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT DODDANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, LOKOJANAHALLI POST CHANNAPATANA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MADHUKAR NADIG, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1173 WP No. 5937 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATION OF LAND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB- DIVISION, RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 4. TAHASILDAR CHANNAPATNA TALUK CHANNAPATNA - 562 160. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K.P.YOGANNA, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATION OF LAND IN SY.NO.6 OF MULUMGERE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TLAUK TO AN EXTENT OF 3-00 ACRE OF LAND BY CONSIDERING THE FORM NO.50 UNDER SECTION 108-C OF KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE RULES 1966 AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS (ANNX-C) DATED 03.09.1991, ETC., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1173 WP No. 5937 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for all the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application filed in Form No.50 seeking regularization of unauthorised occupation of 2 acres of land in Survey No.6 of Mulumgere Village, Kasaba Hobli, Channapatna Taluk, on 03.09.1991, has not been considered till date. Therefore, the prayer in the petition is to direct the respondents to consider the said application and till consideration, direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule property. 3. Having regard to the contentions raised in the writ petition and submission of the learned Counsel for the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1173 WP No. 5937 of 2025 petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that Respondent No.4-Tahsildar was duty bound to place the application filed by the petitioner before Respondent No.2, ‘Committee for Regularization of Unauthorized Cultivation of Land’ and the Committee was also duty bound to consider the application and pass necessary orders. That exercise not having been taken by the respondent authorities, the respondents cannot evict the petitioner without consideration of the application of the petitioner. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of with a specific direction to Respondent No.4-Tahsildar, Channapatna Taluk, Bengaluru South District, to verify from the records as to whether such an application filed by the petitioner in the year 1991, is pending consideration. If it is found that such an application was indeed filed by the petitioner and the application is yet to be considered, the Respondent-Tahsildar is directed to place before Respondent No.5-Committee, the application along with his recommendation within a period of four weeks from - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1173 WP No. 5937 of 2025 the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, Respondent No.5-Committee shall consider the application and pass necessary orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months thereafter. 5. Needless to observe that till the application of the petitioner is disposed of, in terms of the directions issued by this Court, the possession of the petitioner in respect of the petition schedule property shall not be disturbed. Ordered accordingly. 6. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10