[2026:RJ-JP:16274] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5801/2026 1. Pradhan S/o Geetaram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Paiga, Police Station Sop District Tonk (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Bundi). 2. Kaluram S/o Geetaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Paiga, Police Station Sop District Tonk (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Bundi). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through its PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Liyakat Ali HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 17/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 37/2026 registered at Police Station DEI, District Bundi for the offence(s) punishable under Section 115(2), 126(2) & 189(2) of B.N.S., 2023, in which charge-sheet has been filed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 118(1), 118(2), 189 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the accused-petitioners are in custody since 25.03.2026. He also submits that accused-petitioners are not named in the FIR. He further submits that the injuries sustained by the injured, Ramphool are attributed to co-accused Hansraj and Shaitan. He [2026:RJ-JP:16274] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5801/2026] further submits that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the petitioners; conclusion of trial may take a long time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 25.03.2026. The accused-petitioners are not named in the FIR and the injuries sustained by the injured, Ramphool are attributed to co-accused Hansraj and Shaitan; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Pradhan S/o Geetaram & Kaluram S/o Geetaram are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall [2026:RJ-JP:16274] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5801/2026] mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/67