Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3182 RSA No. 305 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 305 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
1. NAZUNNISA W/O SYED ABDUL AZEEZ D/O SYED HAYATH SAHEB AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
2.
SYED ABDUL AZEEZ AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O SYED BASHU SAHEB
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.1589, 1ST CROSS VIJAYANAGAR, BANGARAPET TOWN, BANGARAPET - 563 114. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI RASHEED KHAN, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
SRI. R. PARAMESH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O RAMAPPA, 2ND CROSS, OLD M.M. ROAD, MUNICIPAL COMPLEX, BANGARAPET TOWN. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.11.2024 PASSED IN RA.NO.67/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KGF ITINERARY AT BANGARPET, DISMISSING THE
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3182 RSA No. 305 of 2025
APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.03.2022 PASSED IN OS.NO.394/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANGARPET.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 29