Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4688 (JHR)

UMESH PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4829/2018 · 2026-01-06

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:158 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4829 of 2018 --------- Umesh Paswan, Son of Late Lambodar Paswan, aged about 36 years, Resident of Village-Lochni, P.O.-Sanour, P.S.-Basantrai, District-Godda. ....Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda, At + P.O.-Godda, P.S.- Godda, District Godda. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Godda At + P.O.-Godda, P.S.- Godda, District Godda. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Godda, At + P.O.-Godda, P.S.- Godda, District- Godda. 5. The Circle Officer, Basantrai, P.O. + P.S.-Basantrai, District- Godda. 6. Hemant Kumar Paswan, Son of Late Lambodar Paswan, Resident of Village-Lochni, P.O.-Sanour, P.S.-Basantrai, District-Godda. ....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Shubham Mishra, A.C. to S.C. (Mines)-II Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, Advocate Ms. Priya Kumari, Advocate --------- 09/Dated:-06.01.2026 1. None appears for the petitioner. However, Mr. Shubham Mishra, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, learned counsel for the private respondent are present. 2. From record, it appears that after filing of the writ application, the petitioner has never appeared except once. 3. Looking to the prayer made in this writ application, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in this case, accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) January 6, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 08.01.2026