Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46869 (KAR)

SRI AMARANATH v. SMT GOWRAMMA

MFA/4272/2020 · 2026-02-05

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6862 MFA No. 4272 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4272 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. AMARANATH S/O SRI. NARAYANASWAMI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.43 MANGASANDRA VILLAGE, KOLAR DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANU SHANKAR S.S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SMT. GOWRAMMA WIFE OF RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.322, 3RD 'A' CROSS 2ND BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARANAGARA, BENGALURU-560079 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. H.V.NAGARAJA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6862 MFA No. 4272 of 2020 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. The appeal was listed on 04.02.2026 and there was no representation on behalf of appellant. For appearance of counsel for appellant, it was ordered to be listed on 05.02.2026 and it was also made clear that if none appears on behalf of appellant on the next date of hearing, the appeal would be dismissed for non-prosecution. As already noted above, there is no representation on behalf of appellant. It appears, the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32