Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46865 (CAL)

SUJOY BANERJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/25689/2026 · 2026-10-06

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12 0066..1100..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 25689 of 2026 Sujoy Banerjee Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Arka Kumar Nag Mr. Soham De Dhara Mr. A. Karim Mr. Kaushik Bandyopadhyay …for the petitioner Mr. Rajdeep Majumder Mr. Milind Mohul Ghosh Mr. Madhu Jana …for the State Mr. Rohit Hazra …for the respondent no. 14 Mr. Rishav Kumar Thakur …for the respondent no. 12 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. It is submitted by Mr. Nag, learned advocate representing petitioner that petitioner is political person against whom three FIRs were registered which compelled the petitioner to approach appropriate forum seeking bail and pre-arrest bail. It is submitted that petitioner was taken into custody but since petitioner was granted bail now petitioner is not in custody. It is further submitted that out of three FIRs in connection with two petitioner has obtained bail and in respect of one FIR petitioner has obtained anticipatory bail. 2 3. However, it is contended that petitioner might have been arraigned in other FIRs. It is also submitted that concerned police authorities are required to upload criminal prosecutions which are initiated against accused on designated portal. 4. State respondents and private respondents are represented by learned advocates. 5. Considering the case made out in this writ petition, Deputy Inspector General of Police (Legal), West Bengal is directed to intimate petitioner FIRs pending against him as on date along with necessary particulars by 15th October, 2026 on forwarding an intimation to the petitioner. 6. Leave is granted to learned advocate for petitioner to array Deputy Inspector General of Police (Legal), West Bengal as additional respondent by tomorrow, 7th October, 2026. 7. However, service of notice upon additional respondent is dispensed with since State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 8. Writ petition stands disposed of. 9. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)