- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5835 RFA No. 1342 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1342 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. CHINNA PALAIAH, S/O LATE DODDA MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2. M PALAIAH S/O LATE SANNA MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 3. M BASAVARAJ, S/O LATE SANNA MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 4. M CHINNA PALAIAH, S/O LATE SANNA MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 5. CHINNA PALAIAH, S/O LATE BASAVANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 6. MUDDAIAH, S/O LATE BASAVANAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ALL ARE R/O CHOWLAKERE VILLAGE, NAYAKANAHATTI HOBLI CHALLAKERE TQ, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT -577 536. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SPOORTHY HEGDE NAGARAJA.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5835 RFA No. 1342 of 2018 AND: 1. PALAMMA, D/O LATE PALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2. BASAVARAJA, S/O LATE BASAVNAYAKA M, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 3. OBAMMA, D/O LATE GATTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 4. PALAIAH, S/O LATE GATTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 5. PAPAMMA, W/O LATE PALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 6. BASAPPA, S/O LATE DODDA MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 7. MALLAIAH, S/O LATE DODDA MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 8. M MANJANNA, S/O LATE SANNA MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 9. PAPAMMA, W/O LATE GATTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 10. MALLAIAH, S/O LATE GATTAIAH, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5835 RFA No. 1342 of 2018 AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O CHOWLAKERE VILLAGE, NAYAKANAHATTI HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TQ, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 536. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B M SIDDAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 TO R10 ARE SERVED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.02.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.21/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC, CHALLAKERE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo reporting settlement and consequently he submits that the appellants intend to withdraw the appeal. 2. Learned counsel further submits that pursuant to the settlement, final decree is already drawn. 3. All the appellants and respondent No.1 are present before the Court. Learned counsel for the appellants identify the parties. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5835 RFA No. 1342 of 2018 4. Appellants jointly submit that they intend to withdraw the appeal in lieu of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 5. Memo is accepted. 6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE GVP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1