Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46844 (CAL)

NIJAMUDDIN SARDAR @ NIZAM SARDAR AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3257/2026 · 2026-10-07

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.10.2026 Item No.28 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Rejected In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.(A) 3257 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Haroa Police Station Case No. 778 of 2026 dated 18.08.2026 under Sections 308(5)/316(5)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of: Nijamuddin Sardar @ Nizam Sardar & Anr. ...… petitioners Mr. R. Mukherjee, Advocate Mr. R. Sinha, Advocate .…for the petitioners Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Ld. Sr. Govt. Advocate Ms. R. V. Kundalia, Advocate Mr. Soumalya Dutta, Advocate …for the State 1. Memo of Evidence filed in Court be kept with the record. 2. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail. 3. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. There are four other criminal antecedents so far as petitioners are concerned. Petitioners stand implicated in extortion. 5. Considering the materials in the case diary implicating the petitioners also the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, I am not minded to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2 6. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. 7. CRM(A) 3257 of 2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.07 18:56:42 +05'30'